Thanks for the love. :) Its also very flattering that I could lead an ENTIRE forum anywhere, including astray!
I never considered myself a tyrant of such tremendous abilities that I completely eliminate the avenue of discussion and exploration, on the contrary I have been always open to discuss any concept that I present…and admit when I am wrong.
Too bad MX made the decision to leave without even discussing this with me, not once!
This is a recent post of mine from this thread;
Back in condition: The high weight/fatigue struggle
Originally Posted by dick builder
Originally Posted by Dick Builder
. And, pointing out the flaws in utilizing PI’s in a hanging regimen.
Originally Posted by sparkyx
I’m coming in late here, but I’d like to comment. As the author of the PI approach, I must say that I often state that in hanging, I like Monty’s approach. I really don’t know how much PI approach directly applies to hanging.I’m not a hanging expert, but it seems to me that the PI approach may not really translate over to hanging all that well. It seems to me that hanging is directly addressing connective tissue, all by itself. If thats the case, the PI approach may not apply. I think the PI approach really is addressing smooth muscle reaction during PE and its effect on gains.
It strikes me that if you hang, to stretch or effect the connective tissue, then use ADS to control contraction due to smooth muscle insult, you will be using a completely different set of guidelines.
If that is correct, it probably IS counter productive to take any time off, that constant ADS between heavier stress is probably more effective than time off where smooth muscle could contract and hold the micro tears in a contracted state, allowing gains to be lost and even become shorter than before.
The only way I see time off being productive is if you hold it in an extended state with ADS until healing is done, then time off as a decon to reset on a cellular level.
So as you can see, I MYSELF agree with what you are saying. My DISAGREEMENT is that is the only mechanism of growth. I at this point really believe that PE is divided into two basic mechanisms, one of primarily connective tissue stretching, as you and MX refer to and another one where smooth muscle reaction must be address.
I present my ideas not to garner a following or raise my status, but to share my ideas in order to be of help. I think the reason it has become such a large part of the concepts here, is not my personality or powers of persuasion, but that many have found it effective in their quest to gain, as well as helping them past dead end road blocks in their PE experiments.
I would have loved to discuss this with MX, I don’t think I have ever treated anyone in a way that would lead them to think that I am hostile or disrespectful to open discussion…and if I have, I am truly sorry.