Finding xeno: a penis tale

Thanks for all of the positivity. It’s good to know that I’m being useful.

I’m now in R-phase. Only a three weekends I-phase. No P-phase.

It’s all an experiment. Like Life.

xeno

Thanks TG,

I just looked at the calendar and I have only completed 3 weeks R phase so no where near ready for another I phase. Just seems like so long.

Interesting comment, and helpful, re going to hard. I had planned to go harder in the next I phase so I may have to rethink that.

Either that or I go harder and you go softer and we compare? Ahhh the journey!

Peace!

SB

If I go harder, my PIs drop. And by going harder and getting used to it mentally you likely ignore some of the smaller PIs that popped up to warn you before you experienced a loss in size. Because, in my opinion, if you’d went less hard…you wouldn’t have lost size and you’d have gained 1/8th for the work you did up front and another 1/8 by the time you completed R-phase. There is not a single PE method that rewards you more for going hard early. Every single one suggests you lower, lessen and stall your gains by going overboard at the state.

I’ve seen .25” in length gains and .125” in girth so far and it’s R-phase time I noted them. And it’s on the up, if I can put the ruler down long enough to live my life.

I was over 1/8 inch gain yesterday, after the initial drop. Gaining though doing nothing! Except lig pops.

SB

Concerning the construction and usage of TTr. This is the model with male and female fitted parts shaped >>.

I’m assuming the female part is to hold shaft in place as you apply pressure with male part from opposing side.

I had assumed it served the additional purpose of preventing CS from being compressed, but it sounds like you primarily use it side to side versus top and bottom.

(My assumption assumed you’d want to avoid compressing CS, is this a false assumption?)

Main question is do you align parts perpendicularly or parallel? Parallel makes more sense to me as perpendicular would seem to mimic the tiger trap except with fewer areas of cross compression. Could you please clear up my confusion, or at least try? My thoughts would be if it’s aligned perpendicular but with only one compression point it would serve to promote more radial strain versus longitudinal strain, which the TT might lend more too, but that would be another assumption.

Had to think about your question a bit there MW; but I now understand it. I use the TTr with the ridges oriented perpendicular to the shaft. I apply it about every 1/2 inch or so in a session, so that the whole shaft gets a compression. In my last I-phase, I used my TTr while using a Cable Clamp around the shaft, at maximum tightness, located right up against the coronal ridge…found that combination to be really good at focusing fluid pressure on the CC tips..theoretically good for length gains. Might embiggen the glans too ;) .

I consider the TTr to be a nice complement to the TT in achieving discretized soft tissue deformation. I’ve never tried it with the shaft “nested” in the bottom (M shaped) piece and then impinging the top of the shaft with the top (V shaped) piece. I’m kinda thinking that it would not be very useful in that configuration, but for giggles I’ll give it a whirl in my next I-phase…thinking about May 1 or so.

Thanks for the good question; guessing there are others weren’t clear on that too!

xeno

The word ridges, plural, had me confused for a moment. Then I had an aha moment.

Thanks for the clarification.

Xeno, I just made a TT. and I will be trying it tomorrow. Are you repositioning every 60-120seconds x 20 times? Or is it a straight 20 minutes in the TT?

Ughh, the TTr vs. TT thing again. I use the TTr about 20 times in a session…not the TT. The TT I use maybe 3 to 6 times per session. Yes, about 60-120 seconds per maneuver. In the interest of helping distinguish the two devices, it’s only about 2-6 seconds per maneuver with the TTr.

But really, what I do isn’t important, using your TT in accordance with what your body indicates is right is…well, right. It’s a very communicative device…it will tell you how much is right for you.

Congratulations on your new PE gizmo midatlantic…grow with it instinctively and intuitively…and your penis will grow. Just err on the side of caution to begin.

Good Luck and please share your thoughts on it when you can.

Thanks,

xeno

So I don’t think I can post pictures of my dick here in this thread. So here is a link to my log and me using the TT tonight. Will start my P phase soon. I suspect I will need to make another one with the ridges closer together. Still I’m getting one helluva workout!!!

When attaching the TT vertically my penis want to twist to one side or the other, what do you do to balance this? I just have to hold at the head to keep the shaft aligned. In fact I have to do the same thing when using multiple clamps.

Hey LS, do you have a Progress Report Thread here at ThundersPlace? Looks like one is linked in your signature; why not post your photos there?

Uh..huh…:)

Occasionally, I used to have that with the vertical orientation (not with multiple clamps though). My experience has been that when I get the sequence of wingnut tightening right, the CCs get compressed, rather than twist. I think that with increased familiarity with your TT, that you’ll see more consistent compression rather than twisting.

Really would like to see those photos posted on ThundersPlace. But that’s entirely up to you.

xeno

You got it. I decided to switch my log to thunders, largely because of you and members like you here. We need someone to push the boundaries.

Click me to see Longerstretch’s TT

You rock dude!

Thank you.

xeno

Okay, so some recent progress log things and the discovery of the “chamois” and its use in hanging has me interested in hanging again. May is coming fast and I’d love to pull in more length next I-phase.

My questions are how is hanging applied in IPR? I’ve saying you mention many positive things about hanging but the actual usage of a hanger is a little vague. Except for when you hung over a hundred pounds for a few seconds; I remember that because that was incredibly…notable.

Are IPR protocols different than the normal hanging protocols? As far as hanging times, frequency, weight increases?

And would I experience a better gain pattern using regular hanging protocols first or skipping them entirely? I know this last question is strictly hypothetical but I’m curious what your opinion would be. Take as a given that I have next to no hanging experience anyway.

Used my modified/customized TT yesterday. To my surprise it was much more comfortable than I had predicted but also I was able to compress with much more pressure than I anticipated. For me it seems having a well rested unit allows me to really up the intensity versus being conditioned and riding that overtraining/injury line. Think I’ve found my groove and the TT will be a part of my training going forward. Thanks Xeno.