Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Gaining volume with Kyrpa

I might have missed it but why are you extending to a point less than BPEL during treatment? I thought extending to the BPSFL would be preferred.

Originally Posted by Kyrpa
I have been on the decon now for a quite some time. Actually about three and half months now. Not doing any actual exercises on my unit except the heating test regimen published earlier. During it penis was stretched out without any significant load at the length below BPEL.
I have purchased one of the most affordable ESWT(Extra Corporeal Shock Wave) equipment available the Ginha HL 1602. The ESWT treatment was intended to start way sooner but now it is here and I have finished two sessions with it already.

I am running likes of adjusted Sirini protocol 2hz ( 5x300 shocks, 105 mJ), having treatment twice week for three weeks off and another three weeks etc. I will come down on the shock energy the treatment proceeding further. Using the concave 15mm head without the rubber cap on for producing focused shock waves.
Sirini protocol includes three areas in the shaft and both penile cruras separately treated.

Original protocol uses much lower energy flux density, but because my motives goes beyond the regular ED treatment I am using higher shock energy level here. I am trying to interfere the ECM homeostasis of the ligamentous TA with the protocol.

Because I don´t trust a bit of these Chinese manufacturers claims of what their machinery can produce for a second, therefor I have maxed out the (J/ mm^2) available. At the low 2Hz frequency and concave head , these shocks are as powerful as possible with a machinery using electromagnetic treatment head.

In conjunction I am using LIPUS (Light Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound) the following day. I am using two US PRO 2000 2nd edition at 20% Duty cycle for 15 minutes for the shaft and 5 minutes for both cruras separately. The 20% Duty cycle has 0.08 W /cm^intensity with pulse ratio 1:4 at 100Hz pulse rate.

Both treatments are applied keeping the penis in fixed length extender stretched out at length below the BPEL. This elongated state is prolonged at least for an hour after the treatment.

Third day is for resting while keeping the penis in the fixed length extender as described above 2-3 one hour sets a day. Not stretching the structure but keeping it not retracting because of the treatments and helping the new baseline ECM pressure to settle down for this structural size level.

It is reasonable to assume that I would still be in middle of the healing process from these treatments after 9 weeks from the start of the protocol, therefor I will limit the treatment in one tree weeks phase followed with 6 weeks of rest from ESWT. During the rest I will still use the LIPUS twice a week for 3 weeks.
The lasting three weeks I will start to do some very light jelqs and training the IC muscles before the next to come elongation period (P5).

Originally Posted by Azmike
I might have missed it but why are you extending to a point less than BPEL during treatment? I thought extending to the BPSFL would be preferred.

This is de -condition break treatments, I guess you missed the whole post. And I suggest you to reconsider the whole concept of Decon as well.
Nothing to do with stertching the structure at this point. Quite opposite , I am not in the actual PE program until 9 weeks have passed.
We just simply can´t do any stressful exercise during the break it woud ruin the whole healing process.

My only reasons for the extender use at decon is the nature of the practices.
The EWST with the energy flux used, is such a shock for the penis structures, the structure will most certainly retract because of it.
And I have already witnessed it does .
This is because using ESWT to healty soft tissue we are causing significant degradation of collagen. After the initial damages the healing process begins with high experession of growt factors etc.

Secondly there is reason to believe that after ESWT using the LIPUS the ECM structure will remodel in to new baseline intrernal stresslevel.
Thats why I keep introducing the elongated state, elongated enough but not at the point there is any external stress present.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)


Last edited by Kyrpa : 06-11-2020 at .

Originally Posted by Azmike
I might have missed it but why are you extending to a point less than BPEL during treatment? I thought extending to the BPSFL would be preferred.

Additional response.

Look, hopefully the first post didn´t sound as cold and arrogant I now read it myself. Straightforward and strictly business is the nature here, most of the time at least.

Anyways I would like to add that there is absolutely no intentions to keep every gained millimeter I have achieved.
I have only lost few millimeters to date and I am fully committed to trying to “reset” the residual stresses caused by the growth and the cumulative build up because of the exercise induced residual stress in the TA ECM.

The ESWT will most certainly cause me more loss of gains , but if the treatments I have now picked allow me to gain at the rate I formerly did, the loss is gained back and passed in really short time.

If I I were to desperately hold on to my previous gains I would jeopardize my future gains . Thats why the BPEL length not the BPFSL


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)


Last edited by Kyrpa : 06-11-2020 at .

Originally Posted by zaphod1
I’m the guy that made the stress-relax hanging setup under my home office desk :-) I’ve posted some pictures here (once approved by mod), so that folks can see how it works. The whole thing can be set up and broken down within minutes so that no one (in my family) is any the wiser..

I’ve mimicked yours and Kyrpa’s set up. Truly inspirational. The first 6 workouts I’ve done with the ultrasound workouts were definitely adjustments and trying to figure it all out. After my 6th workout today I think I have it figured out..

My set up, is the small digital scale similar to Tutt’s, a resistance band, and a vacuum cup.

Stress relaxation: seated in my chair with Penis extended strait out, in the vacuum cup, attached to a resistance band and the scale. I slowly push myself back until desired resistance. Every 10 minutes, the scale shows less weight is being used (moment of relaxation) so I increase resistance by 1.5lbs.

Heat therapy: 5lbs, 3mhz, 20mins @ 1.8w.

Post: attempted kyrpa’s cyclic manuals today. 10 minutes total. Variation of 4 pulls; strait out, to the left, to the right, strait down. Had the scale attached to my vacuum, registered about 8lbs of force before slippage. That’s where I could have done better. I was trying to get to about 11-13lbs of force from manual pulls but the vacuum simply can’t handle it. Wondering what my improvement for this portion could be?

Strain: 2.94%

Originally Posted by Kyrpa
Great to hear, and thank you for your kind words. Your enthusiasm is highly appreciated.

We have something very common,as my restrictions to stretch the unit are all because of the stiff septum as well. The exception between you and me is that for me the stiff septum came as a feature I had born with, yours has developed due elongated penis and years of stressing it with the early exercises you had.

I would have never gained any length without these methods. The upper triangular formation of the septum was hard as a steel in 1998, it was as stiff again in 2008 and it was as hard and stiff as ever in 2018. It is that pronounced I can palpate it being like a Achilles tendon of a child.

Now that you are on the program, you might need to adjust the established protocol a bit.
The loading stages you are using should be introduced in slower fashion. If you are able to introduce the loads in smaller increments you could be maximizing your elongation even better.
If you are able to go trough the process with maximizing the stress relaxation effects in the first phase and with small increments through the heated part, staying at the max load the last minutes of the heated part the stiffening of tissue could be minimized and the strain you are witnessing maximized.

I genuinely believe that I will not be the one gaining the most after these techniques are developed in their maximal efficiency.

Well, I believe the opposite. With your pioneering you will end up being the highest gainer revolutionary in the industry. My Lord Priapus bless you.

I will follow your advices in today’s therapy.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Today’s results

Initial BPFSL: 22.3 Down 0.2 from yesterday that I took off.
Final BPFSL: 23.1
Strain 3.4%

Followed Kyrpa’s advice of continuing relaxation through US, and also as an experimental step instead of reaching 4kg I reached 3.5kg.

Since my Initial BPFSL was down 0.2 from yesterday, I believe that I need to do the conventional 3 days on 2 days off protocol. I took yesterday off after the first 2 days. If I did a third day yesterday with the initial 22.5cm perhaps I could have achieved a longer measurement whole keeping the strain slightly over 3%. I plan on continue tomorrow and the day after for 3 consecutive days and then take 2 days off.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Originally Posted by DantheMan2020
I’ve mimicked yours and Kyrpa’s set up. Truly inspirational. The first 6 workouts I’ve done with the ultrasound workouts were definitely adjustments and trying to figure it all out. After my 6th workout today I think I have it figured out..

My set up, is the small digital scale similar to Tutt’s, a resistance band, and a vacuum cup.

Stress relaxation: seated in my chair with Penis extended strait out, in the vacuum cup, attached to a resistance band and the scale. I slowly push myself back until desired resistance. Every 10 minutes, the scale shows less weight is being used (moment of relaxation) so I increase resistance by 1.5lbs.

Heat therapy: 5lbs, 3mhz, 20mins @ 1.8w.

Post: attempted kyrpa’s cyclic manuals today. 10 minutes total. Variation of 4 pulls; strait out, to the left, to the right, strait down. Had the scale attached to my vacuum, registered about 8lbs of force before slippage. That’s where I could have done better. I was trying to get to about 11-13lbs of force from manual pulls but the vacuum simply can’t handle it. Wondering what my improvement for this portion could be?

Strain: 2.94%

Great job! I just want to clarify so that we use correct terms… what you have described is sort of a hybrid creep protocol, not technically stress relaxation. If I’m understanding you right, the band attached to the digital scale is elastic. This converts the SR protocol to creep.

Originally Posted by Tutt
Great job! I just want to clarify so that we use correct terms… what you have described is sort of a hybrid creep protocol, not technically stress relaxation. If I’m understanding you right, the band attached to the digital scale is elastic. This converts the SR protocol to creep.

If the has mimicked the setup correctly, the vacuum cup is somehow locked in the position after applying the tension.
In my set up the cup rests in place against the slotted rubbery cushion, not able to move forward and in zaphoids case the hanger wire is locked to the table with clamping device after each loading. Then it is pure stress-relaxation setup.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Originally Posted by Kyrpa
If the has mimicked the setup correctly, the vacuum cup is somehow locked in the position after applying the tension.
In my set up the cup rests in place against the slotted rubbery cushion, not able to move forward and in zaphoids case the hanger wire is locked to the table with clamping device after each loading. Then it is pure stress-relaxation setup.

The vacuum cup is not secured in place. Perhaps Tutt is right and I am doing a hybrid of SR and creep. I do not come from an engineering background, and have been trying to self-teach myself it all.

Because my scale shows less force being applied on my Penis every 10 minutes, does that not show SR? That doesn’t demonstrate equal strain with less stress?

Understand. No offense taken.
I have read your entire thread and read your updates daily. I own and use both devices you reference prior to discovering your thread.
Thank you for sharing your experiences.

Originally Posted by Kyrpa
Additional response.

Look, hopefully the first post didn´t sound as cold and arrogant I now read it myself. Straightforward and strictly business is the nature here, most of the time at least.

Anyways I would like to add that there is absolutely no intentions to keep every gained millimeter I have achieved.
I have only lost few millimeters to date and I am fully committed to trying to “reset” the residual stresses caused by the growth and the cumulative build up because of the exercise induced residual stress in the TA ECM.

The ESWT will most certainly cause me more loss of gains , but if the treatments I have now picked allow me to gain at the rate I formerly did, the loss is gained back and passed in really short time.

If I I were to desperately hold on to my previous gains I would jeopardize my future gains . Thats why the BPEL length not the BPFSL

What is the purpose of preheat with FIR? Can a lower power US be used instead?

I have used a 100 W black ceramic bulb for terrariums with wavelength presumably 2-6 microns (around $10) and it heats nicely when positioned within 6 inches but while the front of the unit gets hot and the thigh skin gets red the back side of the unit is cooler. Said bulb is also produced in 250 W but would need to be positioned further away to not burn the skin yet will cover more area at once if needed.

Originally Posted by DantheMan2020
The vacuum cup is not secured in place. Perhaps Tutt is right and I am doing a hybrid of SR and creep. I do not come from an engineering background, and have been trying to self-teach myself it all.

Because my scale shows less force being applied on my Penis every 10 minutes, does that not show SR? That doesn’t demonstrate equal strain with less stress?

Privacy info: Clicking on this image will enable content from www.youtube.com. Privacy friendly version via Piped.

The video shows my understanding of what you and Tutt have explained in this thread. We want to be in the plastic region, and the initial stress is toe region.

My scale shows relaxation every 10 minutes.
0-10 mins at 1.1lbs of force, after 10 minutes it lessens to 0.9lbs.
10-20 mins increased another 1.1 pounds to 2.2lbs total, lessens to 1.9lbs
Etc

With the SR.. We shouldn’t be increasing tension every 5-10 minutes? Have you been doing SR with a fixed weight? What am I missing here?

Originally Posted by DantheMan2020
The vacuum cup is not secured in place. Perhaps Tutt is right and I am doing a hybrid of SR and creep. I do not come from an engineering background, and have been trying to self-teach myself it all.

Because my scale shows less force being applied on my Penis every 10 minutes, does that not show SR? That doesn’t demonstrate equal strain with less stress?

This really depends on the stress-strain characteristics of whatever band you are using. IOW, if the band had a large strain region at nearly equivalent stress, then you wouldn’t be seeing any drop in load on the scale because the band would be readily taking up the few millimeters of penis elongation. More likely, you are operating at a steeply upward sloping portion of the band’s stress-strain curve. It takes up some of the penis elongation before you notice a drop in load, but eventually there has been enough to begin to de-stress the band.

As Kyrpa said, if you figured an easy way to lock the strain after each time you move backward, it would be pure stress relaxation. I would say that creep is not terrible. There are several studies on other material showing SR and Creep to produce similar total elongation. There are just a few characteristics of this living organ that I believe make SR preferred. But creep will still work.

Originally Posted by Tutt
This really depends on the stress-strain characteristics of whatever band you are using. IOW, if the band had a large strain region at nearly equivalent stress, then you wouldn’t be seeing any drop in load on the scale because the band would be readily taking up the few millimeters of penis elongation. More likely, you are operating at a steeply upward sloping portion of the band’s stress-strain curve. It takes up some of the penis elongation before you notice a drop in load, but eventually there has been enough to begin to de-stress the band.

As Kyrpa said, if you figured an easy way to lock the strain after each time you move backward, it would be pure stress relaxation. I would say that creep is not terrible. There are several studies on other material showing SR and Creep to produce similar total elongation. There are just a few characteristics of this living organ that I believe make SR preferred. But creep will still work.

Thanks for the reply Tutt. We all do appreciate yours and Kyrpa’s knowledge- and I really am self-teaching myself these engineering concepts.

I’ll have to figure out how to lock the strain, and find a cord that has no stretch available to it. That concept, and whether or not to increase the tension every 5-10minutes is what I believe I am having a very difficult time grasping..

In the video below is shows the curve and at 4:20 the plastic region we desire. Good for people looking for examples

Privacy info: Clicking on this image will enable content from www.youtube.com. Privacy friendly version via Piped.

Originally Posted by DantheMan2020

In the video below is shows the curve and at 4:20 the plastic region we desire

This is my favorite subject. I am afraid that the plastic region so often mentioned during the years is nothing we would desire.
I am sure none of the practitioners in the history of PE have never reached it. Despite there have been hangers hanging with 80,100 and 200lbs for hours. At least one of the recognized persons amongst us has been hanging short times with ridiculous 300 lbs.

Plastic region is one of the major misunderstandings these communities have been continuously repeating without any contact to the reality.
Operating at the plastic region would mean we were just about to break and completely destroy our penises accidentally at any minute.

I have been encouraging people to take a load - strain curves of their own penises to see where we really operate.
If the community had done that starting at 2002 when these thought were presented at first place , all of us would be gaining 2 inch in length in no time.

Hopefully now almost twenty years gone, we can start to work our way through with some data to rely on.

We are operating at the turning point of the end of the toe region and the the start of the elastic region. There can be seen dramatic stiffening seen if the loads are to high or the load is applied in fast rate. I have showed in repeatedly already for longer than year now. Alex 2.0 did find out the elongating stopping at the end of toe region as well

Newest data Tutt has provided insights in the possibility to ease the stiffening and lure the strain further to the elastic range.

The plastic deformation aka permanent elongation start to develop at much lower strains than where the plastic region is located on the curve.
Plastic deformation start to occur at 3% strain part of the strain at this range being irreversible.
Continuing to repeat these strains the cumulative residual elongation is seen as a permanently elongated penis.

The therapeutic heat at 40 C allows significantly higher level of this plastic deformation because of the altered viscous flow properties due the temperature.
With the heat there will be dramatically lower level of damage caused in the tissue relative to the given strain.
Getting in to 3-4% strain range with cold tissue any of the methods allowing this causes inevitable micro-structural damages.

We will continue to produce data to get this sorted out once and for all . And I challenge everyone to do it as it is a simple task.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)


Last edited by Kyrpa : 06-12-2020 at .
Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.