Originally Posted by marinera
The report says there was decrease of sensitivity, but it bordered statistical significance. The decrease in erectile function was more significant; I have never heard though that circumcision is associated with decrease in erectile function before.The sample is too small though, and the fact that they were coming from a unhealthy condition makes it harder to weigh what are subjective feelings.
I was told increased rate of ED in circumcised males, not decreased. And as far as sensitivity goes, I can understand fire goats point on men who restore have a lot invested in the procedure which makes them biased. It is arguable however, that PE doesn’t work either tho, because medically speaking there isn’t unbiased evidence to support it that I can find. In fact, when I did some quick searching on it, most medical sites say surgery is the only way to increase size and other things are just wishful thinking. I don’t tend to believe the medical establishment on that issue because I can’t imagine a site like this would run so long or have so many testimonials without selling anything if everyone here was lying or fudging their measurements because they had so much time invested in trying to enlarge their penis. My knowledge of restoration supports this sites theory of controlled injury to increase the size of the organ, it’s the same technique used to regrow foreskin