Gaining volume with Kyrpa

Ok. Thank you very much for answering. I really appreciate it very much to take your time.

I will continue reading after every post 1874 posts in this thread is read. And follow that line where loads are not elevated more than 25 % after heat. Coming from backround where I have pulled my dick with furious force (no results) and hanged heavy, it’s still learning to keep loads quite light. Devil in head whispers “go heavier, it will produce more”, but what I’ve learned it’s very detrimental to go heavier. And I will try out if I can achieve strain enough with static load only.

I would strongly caution against that high load during cooldown. If you do increase load during cooldown, it really shouldn’t need to be more than 25% greater than the heated load. I’ve demonstrated this repeatedly with my equipment. If the penis is locked when the heat is removed, it feels like a dramatic increase in load, but it is typically around 20%. A backwards way of stating that for those using a hanging type device… if you want to maintain the induced strain during cooldown that you achieved with heat, the load will need to be increased by 20-25%.
…..

I wonder if some of the septums are so tough that they can’t get pliable or stretch at all. I’ve tried infrared heating lamp and all deferent type heating methods and never even once seen any elongation even temporary of FSL increase.I’ve never gained in any type of method and I know that the US is probably that last resort all I need to know is there anyone here like me that has tried all methods possible in PE literature and never gained, and as soon has tried the US achieved the desirable length here? If not maybe some septum’s are so strong that nothing can actually cause them to stretch longer?

Thank you for such an awesome thread Kypra! I would appreciate any response thank you.

I don’t understand why different place shows different specs for US Pro 2000 2nd.

I bought it from Tenspros and it says
H setting: 6,4 W
Max power output 6,4 W
Area 4cm2
Max intensity 6,4 W / 4 = 1,6 W /cm2.

Above specs says
H setting: 4,8 W
Max output 9,6 W
Area 4cm2
Max intensity 9,6 W / 4 cm2 = 2,4 W/cm2

What is this? 2,4 W /cm2 would probably get to shaft temps of +41 C faster/easier?

Did you try the protocol as it is intended to be implemented? Your post is very vague. Just putting a lamp on top of your dick is not going to magically turn it into a chewing gum.

Yea I did try the protocol I just didn’t want to expand on it here, I wanted to try to protocol with the IR lamp before buying the US machine just to see maybe I’ll see any effects from the IR lamp but nothing. I guess the US is able to go deeper and reach the septum…

@Kyrpa:

I found on eBay an ad that sells US 2000 UT 2ND edition devices that have this specification:

FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS:Working Frequency: 1.0MHz+-10%
Max Value Power Output: 9.60W+-20% (Duty Cycle 100%)
Power Output: L 2.88W, M: 3.84W, H: 4.80W
Modulate Frequency:50Hz+-10%
Modulate Duty Cycle:Adjustable, L (30%), M (40%), H (50%)
Effective Radiation Area:4.0cm
Maximum Effective Sound 2.4W/cm2+_20% (Duty Cycle: 100%) )
Intensity:Max RBN 5.0
Beam Type:Collimated
Material of US Head:Aluminum
Working Voltage:15VDC
Working Current: less than 1.0A
Static current less 80A
Working Time:Adjustable 5 min, 10 min, 15 min
Max Controlled Temperature of 42+-2º C (36º F)
Ultrasound Size:202mm(L)x49mm(W)x0mm(H) (8”x2”x2 3/4”)
202mm(L)x49mm(W)x0mm(H) (8”x2”x2
Safety Style:Class IIa, BF-type

Would this one work?

Yea I did try the protocol I just didn’t want to expand on it here, I wanted to try to protocol with the IR lamp before buying the US machine just to see maybe I’ll see any effects from the IR lamp but nothing. I guess the US is able to go deeper and reach the septum…

Why don’t we use simply metal on the dorsal side? Metal has a ~0.03% reflection.

Simply put a metal ruler on top, that could reflect all soundwaves? @Kyrpa.