Sorry to be picking up these nuances. I just happen to be bit tender if I am referred erroneously.
That is your right and absolutely understandable. Therefore no apologies necessary. I had understood it that way and perhaps interpreted it somewhat ambitiously. I must admit that it is not the first time that I have not reproduced your statement quite correctly, so I must apologize.
Thank you again for the clarification. That was the biggest question mark that remained for me.