Originally Posted by Trapezius
Are you guys sure that example when using electric heating pad wrapped around dick that you cannot reach +40 celcius inside shaft? I have experimented with it so that it’s wrapped around for long time and temperature accumulates slowly to almost unbearable to skin and shaft skin feels very hot. I would imagine that when the heat comes from all directions it must transfer to some depth and not only skin?
We have only one example of urethral temperature control with a heating pad, Manko007 needed 20 minutes to achieve 40 C at urethra depth. At this point, skin starts to ache and no more temperature raise inside the urethra detected.
Literature supporting the conduction method having diminishing results going deeper.
With any method the body’s own thermoregulatory system being very effective in cooling the penis with highly accelerated blood flow due to the temperature elevation.
I have never in my life detected a pulse on my resting flaccid penis, but at +40°C with the ultrasound, it is clearly present. The 37°C arterial blood flushing through trying to cool down the thing.
BTW the oxygenation of the flaccid penis is really poor, therefore with deep heating, fresh oxygenated blood pouring through makes this a healing event as well.
Restricting the flow with a clamp will make heating efforts more effective, but I emphasize we can run into all sorts of other concerns with the method.
Adding risky variables to already complex practice should rise the risk level therefore choosing an already effective deep heating method makes more sense.
As we know there are plenty of examples of any heating providing better gains for some. At the same time, there are as many not finding help from conventional methods.
No one other than Manko has come up with the numbers with other methods so it makes the speculation pointless.
START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"
When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)