I’ve been reading through this thread off and on for about a week, and I keep coming across guys who insist "everyone knows" that most women think "bigger is better." To quote Jeff "The Dude" Lebowski in reply, "Yeah, well, you know, that’s just like, uh, your opinion, man."
Given that Thunder’s Place seems to attract many guys (at least in the forums) who are interested in fact-based and scientific approaches to PE, I’m surprised I haven’t come across more citations in this discussion of actual research about women’s preferences for penis size. I think I’ve seen a few mentions of studies, but there’s also a whole lot of conjecture, opinion, and anecdotal experience—none of which amounts to decisive evidence.
Being interested in this topic, I looked up a couple of articles to help get a more definitive answer to this question. The most useful I have found thus far is this one using 3D models (it’s been referenced elsewhere either in this thread or another):
Prause N, Park J, Leung S, Miller G (2015), "Women’s Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models." PLOS ONE 10(9): e0133079. h***s://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133079
Participants were 75 mostly white or Asian women of 18 years or older who are sexually attracted to men. They were recruited by flyers distributed around a university campus in Los Angeles, California (the capital of the porn industry), its surrounding neighborhood, and local physicians’ offices. The participants were then given a battery of questions and tasks, the chief task being to pick the model most closely approximating their preferred penis size from 33 differently sized 3D-printed models. The result was as follows:
"There was a small main effect for expected relationship duration, F(1,59) = 4.4, p = .04, ηp2 = .07 (see Fig 6), such that participants preferred a slightly larger penis size in one-time (length = 6.4 inches or 16.3 cm, circumference = 5.0 inches or 12.7 cm) partners as compared to long-term partners (length = 6.3 inches or 16.0 cm, circumference = 4.8 inches or 12.2 cm)."
So, the women in that study preferred only somewhat above average for long-term sexual relationships, and only slightly more than that for a one-time fling.
Another intriguing study I found is one analyzing sex toy sales by the largest online sex toy retailer, Lovehoney:
Johns, S. E., & Bushnell, N. (2024). What Drives Sex Toy Popularity? A Morphological Examination of Vaginally-Insertable Products Sold by the World’s Largest Sexual Wellness Company. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(2), 161–168. h***s://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2175193
Granted, toy preferences are not an entirely reliable stand-in for preferences when it comes to real, live penises; but it may be reasonable to infer that sex toy sizes getting regular usage have some correlation to actual penis-size preference.
The authors performed a regression analysis upon the data set provided by the company to determine the chief characteristics of their consumers’ sex toy preferences. Here are their findings regarding size:
"Insertable Length in our sample was significantly larger (mean = 7.07 inches ± 1.72, Min = 4 inches, Max = 14 inches, t (265) = 18.02, p = <.001, 95% CI, 1.70–2.12) than the described population-wide average (5.16 inches; Veale et al., Citation2015). Additionally, Circumference was also found to be significantly girthier in our sample (t (259) = 11.27, p = <.001, 95% CI, 0.77–1.10, mean = 5.52 ± 1.34, Min = 3 inches, Max = 10 inches) when compared to the mean erect circumference of 15,521 penises (4.59 inches; Veale et al., Citation2015)."
Length, however, turned out not to be a significant factor in determining popularity of a toy in sales. Girth was—but only up to a point after which sales dropped off. The authors further state:
"Our results further highlight that women may not be simply seeking a large phallus size as could be assumed given the sociocultural influences around this being a desirable trait (Sharp & Oates, Citation2019)… However, we found that for toys at least, although circumference was influential in predicting product popularity, insertable toys of a larger girth in our sample were less popular, while length was non-significant. There appears to be an emphasis on offering slightly larger than average phallus products, and yet products with larger circumferences were not as popular as less girthy models. In our sample, the 5 most popular products had a mean circumference of 4.85Â inches which is just above the average circumference for real penises."
That 4.85" mean girth of the five most popular products is in line with the study using 3D-printed models (4.8" for long-term partners and 5.0" for short-term).
At least according to these studies, then, women on the whole do indeed think bigger is better—but only somewhat bigger than average, after which the law of diminishing returns goes into effect with a considerable drop off in preference the larger one gets.
The studies’ findings also suggest to me that, out of all the observations made in this thread, those saying lengths of between 6.5 and 7.5 inches for length and girths between 5.0 and 5.5 are the upper limit of what most women want are probably hitting closer to the mark than those saying it’s more than that.
Anyone else seen some good research articles on this topic to share here?
Note: for the citations, I replaced "https" with "h***s" to avoid breaking any rules about hyperlinks.